The Federal Reserve enters 2026 after a year that left few clean answers. Interest rates are lower than they were, but still restrictive for some parts of the economy.
Growth has surprised on the upside, inflation has cooled but not enough, and the labour market is no longer as tight as it once was.
The year ahead carries some risks for the central bank, and investors are currently left with little clarity on what to expect.
A Fed that is done rushing
After cutting rates three times in 2025, the Fed begins 2026 with the federal funds rate at 3.50-3.75%.
Most estimates of the neutral rate cluster around 3%, according to the Fed’s December projections.
When rates are far above neutral, the central bank moves with purpose. When rates are near it, decisions slow down.
That is why an extended pause is the most likely starting point for 2026. Officials across the spectrum have said policy is now within a plausible neutral range.
Jerome Powell told reporters in December that the Fed is “well positioned to wait.”
This is the chair recognising that small moves near neutral carry more risk of error.
Markets currently price about 50 basis points of easing this year, according to CME FedWatch data.
That expectation is not unreasonable, but timing is more important.
The Fed is unlikely to cut early in the year unless the data force its hand.
A January cut would require a clear break in the labour market or a rapid fall in inflation. Neither has happened yet.
Why jobs matter more than prices right now
The US economy entered the year with strong momentum.
Inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target, although it has improved.
At the same time, the unemployment rate has risen to 4.6%, its highest level since 2021.
Job growth has slowed, and hiring rates are lower than a year ago. This tension sits at the centre of every policy debate.
Several Fed officials have emphasised the labour market’s softening.
Anna Paulson, president of the Philadelphia Fed, described it as bending, not breaking, while saying modest rate cuts later in 2026 could be appropriate if inflation continues to ease.
That conditional phrasing is important as the Fed is no longer trying to slow demand, but trying to avoid tightening by mistake.
Morningstar expects one or two cuts in 2026, but slower than markets currently assume.
Tariffs announced in 2025 are still feeding through to goods prices, which could keep inflation sticky early in the year.
If that happens while unemployment drifts higher, the Fed will face uncomfortable tradeoffs.
In that case, jobs are likely to carry more weight than month-to-month inflation prints.
The deeper point for investors is that the Fed’s reaction function has narrowed. It will not respond to every downside surprise.
It will respond if weakness begins to spread across the labour market, especially if claims rise and layoffs broaden beyond a few sectors.
Inside a divided committee
Unusual dissent marked the Fed’s decisions in late 2025. Each rate cut drew opposing votes, with some officials wanting larger moves and others preferring no cut at all. Those divisions are not going away.
One group on the committee believes policy is already close enough to neutral that patience is the safest course.
Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari has said rates are probably near neutral given the economy’s resilience.
Richmond Fed president Tom Barkin has warned that further decisions will require careful judgment as unemployment rises and inflation stays above target.
Another, smaller group argues that policy is still clearly restrictive.
Fed governor Stephen Miran has said more than a full percentage point of cuts will be justified in 2026.
That view is well outside the median projection, which shows just one quarter point cut this year.
Source: Morningstar
For investors, this split has consequences. It raises the odds of dissenting votes continuing and increases market sensitivity to speeches and interviews.
Near neutral, disagreement matters more because each vote carries more informational value.
Leadership and independence are part of the price
The policy debate in 2026 cannot be separated from leadership risk. Powell’s term as chair expires in May, and the White House has not yet named a successor.
Potential candidates are widely seen as more supportive of lower rates, which aligns with President Donald Trump’s public pressure on the Fed.
Former New York Fed president Bill Dudley has warned that the real risk is not a chair who prefers lower rates, but one who undermines confidence in the Fed’s commitment to inflation control.
Markets tend to enforce discipline quickly when credibility comes into question.
Bond yields rise, the dollar weakens, and financial conditions tighten without the Fed changing a single setting.
That is why the committee structure still matters. A chair cannot dictate policy alone.
A nominee seen as overtly political would struggle to build consensus inside the Federal Open Market Committee.
Investors should expect noise around the nomination, but not a sudden loss of institutional control.
Alongside leadership, balance sheet policy remains a quiet constraint. The Fed’s balance sheet stands near $6.6 trillion.
The Fed will continue buying Treasurys to keep reserves ample and money markets stable.
A sharp reduction would risk rate volatility and banking stress. That is another reason why aggressive easing and aggressive balance sheet tightening are both unlikely.
What this means for markets
For equities, the most probable Fed path is supportive but not explosive.
A long pause followed by one or two cuts later in the year lowers the risk of a policy mistake while keeping real rates from drifting higher as inflation cools.
That environment tends to favour earnings quality over broad multiple expansion.
The larger risk is not fewer cuts. It is a rise in long-term yields driven by doubts about independence or inflation persistence.
If bond investors demand a higher premium to hold US debt, stocks can struggle even if the Fed eases. This is the scenario equity markets would find hardest to digest.
In the absence of that shock, 2026 looks like a year where policy does less of the work.
Growth, fiscal choices, and productivity gains from investment in technology will carry more weight.
The Fed’s role will be narrower, slower, and more reactive. That may feel unsatisfying to traders looking for clear signals, but it is often how late-cycle policy actually plays out when rates are already close to where they belong.
The post What investors should expect from the Federal Reserve in 2026 appeared first on Invezz
