In a bold and deeply divisive move, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced a plan for a mandatory new digital ID for the United Kingdom.
Billed as a pragmatic solution to illegal immigration, the proposal has instead ignited a political firestorm, sparking fierce opposition and raising profound questions about civil liberties, the power of the state, and the fragile peace in Northern Ireland.
But what is this plan, how would it work, and why is it so controversial?
What is the government proposing?
The core of the plan is a new digital ID, held on a person’s phone, that will become a mandatory requirement for proving the right to work or rent a home in the UK.
At a conference of world leaders on Friday, the Prime Minister was unequivocal.
“Let me spell it out, you will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID,” Starmer declared.
The government says the ID will be available to all UK citizens and legal residents by the end of the current parliamentary term.
The stated goal is to curb illegal immigration by making it impossible for those who enter the country unlawfully to earn money.
What problem is it trying to solve?
The government is framing this as a direct response to public concern over illegal immigration.
In an article for The Telegraph, Starmer admitted that his own Labour party has previously shied away from the issue but now sees it as “essential” to tackle “every aspect of the problem.”
He argued that the digital ID provides a modern, secure, and effective tool to ensure that only those with a legal right to be in the country can access the job market.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy echoed this, saying, “We think this is a huge step forward to tackle illegal working.”
Why are critics so opposed?
The opposition to the plan is broad, fierce, and comes from multiple fronts.
Political opposition: Rival parties have slammed the plan. The Conservatives dismissed it as a “desperate gimmick,” while Reform UK leader Nigel Farage called it a “cynical ploy” that will be used to “control and penalise the rest of us.”
Civil liberties: The Liberal Democrats and the Green Party have raised serious concerns about a slide toward a surveillance state, arguing that mandatory ID cards are fundamentally at odds with British values of freedom and privacy.
The Northern Ireland problem: The most explosive opposition has come from Northern Ireland, where a united front of political leaders has warned the plan could directly undermine the Good Friday Agreement.
The peace deal guarantees the free movement of people across the Irish border. Requiring a digital ID for work or housing, they argue, would be “especially problematic” for the thousands who cross the border daily for work, family, and study.
First Minister Michelle O’Neill called the plan “ludicrous” and an attack on the peace deal, while SDLP leader Claire Hanna has demanded Northern Ireland be made exempt.
What happens next?
The government’s announcement has set the stage for a major political and legislative battle.
With such a powerful and diverse coalition of opposition, from rival political parties to civil liberties groups and the entire political establishment of Northern Ireland, the path to passing this legislation will be fraught with difficulty.
The Prime Minister may have intended to project strength, but he has instead ignited a multi-front war over the very definition of security and freedom in modern Britain.
The post UK’s digital ID plan: What it is, how it works, and why it’s facing a backlash appeared first on Invezz
